
"Until the 1990s, broadly speaking, shopping choices tended to reflect spending power. The rich bought expensive things, and accounted for most luxury-goods sales. The poor tended to buy cheap, low-quality stuff. And the middle classes stuck to the mid-market. Today, however, middle-class shoppers around the world are not content to be marooned in mediocrity. Instead, these consumers, who earn between $50,000-150,000, are “trading up and trading down” both at the same time."

In short, the middle class is fast becoming the beacon of the new culture of consumption, and retailers might want to respond. To start things off: In-city locations (the new capitals of consumption), more sustainable products, more appealing shopping experiences (start with lighting, for example), and more commitment to contemporary design. As Koolhass put it, shopping space is the new public space so, aside from the obvious moral issues, when is branding going to respond?
On the other hand, and rapidly adding to the middle class' spending power, are on-line stores. Who needs physical space when you can purchase goods at lower costs while sitting at home in virtual space? Of course, the discussion starts out with a poignant question: Are on-line spaces really places? And if so, are we ready? What about the design of the interface? Can on-line retailers really provide a pleasant space to shop? If the notion of shopping space as public space holds its power, will we completely transform into a network of individuals where "village" is replaced by "network?"
"The developed world has been experiencing for over a century a shift away from communities based on small-group-like villages and neighborhoods and towards flexible partial communities based on networked households and individuals."
Much potential exists here for designers such as product and package design, advertising, urban design, and architecture, all the while having strong political and economic ramifications.
No comments:
Post a Comment